Monday, June 13, 2016

Reflective Journal Entry #4

Description

The focus of reading and discussion in EDAT 6115 this week was about effective lesson planning as a teacher.  The lesson focused on ideas such as direct instruction as well as diving into how student learn and transfer other concepts.  Ideas of small group discussions verse whole group discussions were brought up.  When thinking about how to be an intentional teacher and how to select instructional strategies with a purpose really set a tone with me.

Analysis
           
            As teachers we have many strategies and techniques to teach content material to students.  Slavin (2012) states, “The lesson is where education takes place” (p.184).  That sentence is so powerful when we think of what one small lesson can do in the eyes of a child.  As educators we spend countless hours planning out lessons for our students in order to engrain new knowledge into their brains.  When we think about the best practices and what could work best for them it really makes you think about what types of lessons would serve the best purpose for their education.
            “The term direct instruction is used to describe lessons in which you transmit information directly to student, structuring class time to reach a clearly defined set of objectives as efficiently as possible” (Slavin, 2012, p.185).  We can break down a direct instruction lesson into many different parts.  The first step in a teaching a direct instruction lesson is to state learning objectives.  Communicating to students what you want them to know at the end of the lesson will help students better understand what they are working towards.  Next, the teacher needs to “establish a positive mental set or attitude of readiness in students” (Slavin, 2012, p.189).  In doing this you set expectations for the students to see the importance in their education.  The educator can spark an interest in the topic and get the student excited about their learning.  Following setting a mental set the educator will then review prerequisites.  The teacher should check back as to what material the students have already mastered and link that to the new information about to be taught.  Some teachers may call this the “connect” part of the mini lesson.  After that new material can be presented.  Silver (2007) reports, “Direct instruction nurtures learners as they move toward independence” (p.38).  New learners benefit from new information being taught through explanations, modeling, worked examples, embedded video, and content coverage.  Conduct learning probes come next in the sequence.  In order to truly understand if students understand the material being taught you need to frequently probe them to check for mastery.  Probes refer to “any of a variety of ways of asking for brief student responses to lesson content” (Slavin, 2012, p.194).  Once you have checked on their understanding you can then provide independent practice.  This is work students complete on their own after having ample opportunity for gaining new information.  Following this, the teacher can then assess performance and provide feedback.  Feedback is important to a student, “the teacher should serve as a coach who guides, instructs, and provides feedback” (Silver, 2007, p.39).  Lastly the teach will then provide distributed practice and review.
            Just as direct instruction is proven to be a great use of strategy, so can discussions.  Discussion can take the form of multiple ways.  A discussion can be whole-class discussion where the teacher guides “the discussion and helps the class avoid dead ends but should encourage the students to come up with their own ideas” (Slavin, 2012, p.209).  In these discussions the students explore their own ideas and can lead the conversation into whatever direction it is lead.  In contrast to this would be small-group discussions.  “Like any discussion, most small-group discussions should follow the presentation of information through teacher-directed lessons, books, or videos, or following an opportunity for students to find information for themselves in the library or online” (Slavin, 2012, p.210).

Reflection

            This concept really made me think about my teaching.  As a new teacher I am all about small group instruction.  I create preassessments to guide my instruction and then work in small groups based on student needs.  However, I realized that there are instances where direct instruction would benefit students.  While I do not always agree with whole group instruction, there are times where students just need to learn the information coming from the teacher.  Research has proven that a balance between the two is important.  Especially when it comes to student’s learning styles.  Many students may benefit from a lesson taught as a lecture to the whole group.
            After reading this chapter I may better use whole-group discussions to better myself as a teacher.  I generally use a lot of collaborative discussions at the beginning of the school year to have discussions about friendship and getting along with one another.  The students do so well communicating their thoughts and ideas respectively with one another.  I would like to take this to the next level and try this with content and really see what discussions could come out of the children.  I am always amazed when I do not think my students can do something, but after trying I am so pleased with the outcome.
            While I do want to open my horizon to try the concept of direct instruction I do see some limitations that appeal to me as negative aspects.  The past few years I have had an inclusion classroom.  I have students ranging from highly gifted to in the process of being transitioned into a self-contained classroom.  While I understand all of the components of a direct instruction lesson, I feel as though I prefer small group instruction just so I can be sure that all my students are benefitting from the lesson.  While there are times when you can go back and do more modeling and independent practice, I feel as though sometimes students need that one on one instruction from the beginning.  I guess that can be the beauty in instruction, meeting the individual needs of your learners based on how you know them and what they best need to succeed.
            Prior to this week I did not think about discussions being done in small groups.  I have practiced sentence stems in a while group discussion and also have done small group projects but never small group discussions. This past school year I attempted to do collaborative book clubs but then failed to continue the process to get them up and running.  This will be a future goal of mine going into the upcoming school year.  I want to challenge myself to challenge my students into having small group conversations not only about the books that they are reading but also the content they are learning about.

References

Silver, Harvey F. (2007). The Strategic Teacher: Selecting the right research-based strategy for every lesson. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.


Slavin, R. E. (2012). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

No comments:

Post a Comment